Contemporary // 2011
Syrian Civil War
The Syrian civil war was an armed conflict that began with the Syrian revolution in March 2011, when popular discontent with the Ba'athist regime ruled by Bashar al-Assad triggered large-scale protests and pro-democracy rallies across Syria, as part of the wider Arab Spring. The Assad regime responded to the protests with lethal force, which led to a series of defections, the emergence of armed opposition groups, and the civilian uprising descending into a civil war. The war lasted almost 14 years and culminated in the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024. Many sources regard this as the end of the civil war even though clashes have continued into 2026.
Tactical Map#
21 battles plotted
LOADING MAP TELEMETRY…
War Tempo#
Battle cadence by year
Battles per year
31 battles
Heaviest fighting in 2016 — 6 catalogued battles.
Causes#
The Syrian Civil War's proximate trigger was the regime's response to peaceful protest. In March 2011, security forces in the southern city of Deraa arrested and tortured a group of teenagers who had spray-painted anti-government graffiti on a school wall[1]. When residents took to the streets to demand their release, Syrian security forces opened fire on the crowd. The killings ignited demonstrations across the country, and the Assad government's decision to meet each successive wave of protest with live ammunition, mass detention, and torture transformed a political crisis into an armed insurgency within months.
The structural conditions for that explosion had been accumulating for decades. Hafez al-Assad had built the Syrian state around a narrow Alawite security elite embedded in a nominally pan-Arab Ba'athist single-party system, suppressing political opposition with systematic brutality — most notoriously in the 1982 Hama massacre, in which government forces killed an estimated ten thousand to forty thousand people to crush a Muslim Brotherhood uprising[1]. When Bashar al-Assad inherited power in 2000, he introduced limited economic liberalization without any corresponding political opening. The reforms disproportionately benefited a connected business class in Damascus and Aleppo while accelerating rural dispossession. Between 2006 and 2010, a severe drought — among the worst in the region's recorded history — drove an estimated 1.5 million agricultural workers and their families into the peripheries of Syrian cities[1], swelling a population of underemployed young men with acute grievances against a state that had abandoned them.
Syria's demographic and sectarian composition gave those grievances a communal dimension that the regime deliberately exploited. The country's Sunni Arab majority had long chafed under a system in which Alawites — roughly twelve percent of the population — controlled the military's officer corps and the principal intelligence services. The Ba'athist state had managed this tension through a combination of secular nationalist ideology, patronage networks, and coercion. As protests spread in 2011, the government framed the opposition as a Salafi-jihadist conspiracy backed by foreign powers, a framing that was initially false but became partially self-fulfilling as the conflict militarized and Islamist factions, some with external Gulf financing, grew within the armed opposition[1].
The regional and international context made a negotiated de-escalation structurally unlikely from an early stage. Syria's position as a client of Iran and a conduit for weapons to Hezbollah made it a central node in the "Axis of Resistance," giving Tehran and Moscow strong incentives to sustain the Assad government regardless of the human cost[1]. Gulf states, Turkey, and Western governments moved in the opposite direction, providing political recognition and varying degrees of material support to opposition factions. The Arab Spring itself supplied an ideological frame: the rapid fall of Ben Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt in early 2011 persuaded Syrian protesters that mass mobilization could force a similar outcome, and persuaded the Assad government that any concession would be read as terminal weakness[1]. Those two miscalculations, meeting head-on in the spring and summer of 2011, foreclosed the political space in which a negotiated transition might otherwise have been attempted.
Consequences#
The Assad regime's fall in December 2024, when opposition forces led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and allied factions swept through Aleppo, Hama, Homs, and Damascus in a matter of days, ended nearly fourteen years of civil war without a formal peace treaty or internationally brokered settlement[1]. Bashar al-Assad fled to Russia, and a transitional governing authority assumed nominal control of Damascus. No comprehensive ceasefire agreement bound the remaining armed actors, and the absence of a negotiated framework meant that the territorial, constitutional, and humanitarian questions accumulated over the war's duration were left unresolved at the moment of regime collapse. The contrast with the structured postwar settlements of earlier conflicts is stark: Syria in late 2024 entered a post-Assad period without a functioning state apparatus, a unified military command, or an agreed constitutional order.
The political and institutional consequences were immediate and severe. Decades of Ba'athist single-party rule had deliberately hollowed out every institution capable of operating independently of the Assad family's security apparatus. The intelligence services, the officer corps, and the civil bureaucracy had been instruments of regime survival rather than governance, and they disintegrated alongside the regime[1]. The transitional authorities inherited a state infrastructure extensively damaged by fourteen years of bombardment, deliberate destruction, and neglect. Reconstituting a legitimate central government capable of exercising authority across a territory fragmented among multiple armed factions — including Kurdish-led forces in the northeast, Turkish-backed groups in the northwest, and remnant loyalist pockets — represented a challenge without obvious precedent in the modern Arab world.
The geopolitical consequences extended well beyond Syria's borders. Iran's strategic position suffered a significant blow: the land corridor through which it had supplied Hezbollah in Lebanon ran through Syrian territory, and the regime's fall severed that logistical line at a moment when Hezbollah had already sustained heavy losses in its 2024 conflict with Israel[1]. Russia lost its principal Arab client and faced uncertainty over the future of its naval facility at Tartus and its air base at Hmeimim, both of which had anchored Moscow's Mediterranean military posture since 2015[1]. Turkey, which had backed opposition factions throughout the war and maintained a military presence in northern Syria, emerged with expanded influence but also with unresolved tensions over the status of Kurdish-controlled territory along its border.
The humanitarian and demographic consequences of the war were of a scale that will shape Syrian society for a generation. Estimates of the death toll range from 300,000 to over 500,000[1], with millions more wounded or permanently displaced. Approximately 6.6 million Syrians remained registered as refugees abroad as of 2024, the majority in Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan, with substantial populations in Europe[1]; a further 6 to 7 million were internally displaced. The physical destruction of Aleppo, Homs, Raqqa, and large portions of the Damascus suburbs represented an economic loss estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars. The return of refugees — politically contested in host countries and practically constrained by the destruction of housing and infrastructure — posed one of the most complex reconstruction challenges of the postwar period.
What the fall of the Assad regime did not resolve was, in several respects, as consequential as what it ended. The sectarian and communal tensions that the regime had both suppressed and instrumentalized remained embedded in Syrian society, and the composition of the transitional authorities — dominated by factions with roots in Sunni Islamist networks — raised legitimate concerns among Alawite, Christian, Druze, and Kurdish communities about their place in a post-Assad order[1]. The northeast, where the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces administered a substantial population under a separate governance structure, remained outside transitional authority control, and its ultimate status was unresolved. The broader question of accountability for war crimes — committed by the regime, by jihadist factions, and by foreign interveners — had no institutional mechanism for adjudication. Syria's civil war thus ended not with a settlement but with a collapse, leaving the country's reconstruction, reconciliation, and constitutional future as open problems inherited by a fragile and contested transitional order.
Campaigns#
0 operational sequences
Battles#
31 catalogued engagements
- May 2011 Talkalakh Siege
May 14, 2011
The May 2011 operation in Talkalakh was one of the early instances of the Syrian military deploying large-scale force against its own population during the uprising that began that year. The government framed the operation as a counter-terrorism measure, while opposition accounts characterized it as a crackdown on pro-democracy protesters — a divergence in narrative that reflected the broader contest over legitimacy that defined the early Syrian conflict. With Syrian government forces numbering between 7,000 and 8,000 against an opposition estimated at 5,000, and opposition casualties reported at 3,500, the operation signaled the Assad government's willingness to apply concentrated military pressure on towns resisting central authority, a pattern that would recur across Syria as the uprising expanded into full civil war.
- Siege of Homs
May 6, 2011
The Siege of Homs was a prolonged three-year military confrontation between Syrian government forces and opposition fighters in one of the conflict's major rebel strongholds. Beginning in May 2011, the siege became one of the defining engagements of the Syrian Civil War, lasting until May 2014 and concluding with an opposition withdrawal from the city. The fall of Homs represented a significant shift in government control over a strategically important urban center that had early in the conflict emerged as a focal point of armed resistance. Casualties on both sides were substantial, with opposition losses estimated between 2,000 and 2,200 and government losses recorded at roughly 2,012, reflecting the attritional nature of prolonged urban siege warfare. The outcome demonstrated the Syrian government's capacity to reclaim major population centers through sustained military pressure, even at considerable cost.
- Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war
January 1, 2011
Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war evolved from diplomatic condemnation to direct military intervention, making Turkey one of the most consequential external actors in the conflict. After condemning Assad's crackdown in 2011, Turkey began training Syrian Army defectors on its territory under MİT supervision, out of which the Free Syrian Army emerged in July 2011. Border clashes in 2012 marked an escalation, followed by direct military interventions between 2016 and 2022 that produced a sustained Turkish occupation of northern Syria from August 2016 onward. In December 2024, Turkish proxy forces participating in the broader Syrian rebel offensive toppled the Assad regime in Damascus with U.S. support, positioning Turkey as the most influential external party in the conflict by its end. The arc of Turkish involvement—from diplomatic rupture to proxy warfare to occupation—fundamentally shaped the territorial fragmentation of Syria and the ultimate collapse of the Assad government.
- Battle of Aleppo
July 19, 2012
- Battle of Ras al-Ayn
December 17, 2012
The Battle of Ras al-Ayn illustrated the multi-sided character of the Syrian Civil War, where Kurdish, Syrian government, and opposition forces pursued competing objectives in the same urban space. In its first phase, Syrian Arab Army forces were expelled from the town by Syrian rebels, only for those rebels to then turn against the YPG-affiliated fighters who held parts of the city. This rapid realignment demonstrated that opposition to the Assad government did not produce a unified front; rebel and Kurdish forces treated each other as adversaries once the common Syrian Army presence was removed. Over the following months the city remained divided between rebel-held and YPG-held zones, with intermittent fighting gradually expanding YPG territorial control. The growing dominance of Islamist factions among the rebels deepened the conflict's ideological dimension, sharpening tensions with the secular-leftist YPG. The battle's final phase in July 2013 ended with a YPG-led alliance fully expelling rebel forces from Ras al-Ayn, consolidating Kurdish administrative control over the town and marking an early, concrete expansion of the Rojava autonomous zone in northern Syria.
- Battle of Raqqa
March 2, 2013
- Opération Chammal
September 19, 2014
Opération Chammal represents France's primary military commitment to the counter-Islamic State campaign in Iraq and Syria, launched to halt the expansion of the Islamic State and to bolster the Iraqi Army. The operation placed French forces alongside the broader international coalition effort, marking a sustained French military engagement in the region. The operation's name derives from the Shamal, a northwesterly wind over Iraq and the Persian Gulf, a choice reflecting the geographic and cultural context of the theater. With a French force of approximately 2,000 personnel operating against an Islamic State strength estimated at 9,000, the operation formed a significant component of external pressure on the group across both Iraqi and Syrian territory.
- Siege of Deir ez-Zor
July 14, 2014
The Siege of Deir ez-Zor represented one of the longest sustained engagements of the Syrian Civil War, with Islamic State forces maintaining a blockade of Syrian government-held districts in the city for nearly three years and two months. IS sought to capture Deir ez-Zor in order to consolidate full control over Deir ez-Zor Governorate, a strategically significant objective given the region's importance to IS territorial ambitions in eastern Syria. Government forces numbering between 4,000 and 5,000 held out against an IS contingent estimated at up to 15,000 fighters. The siege ultimately failed in its objective: the Syrian Army broke through and fully recaptured the city within nine weeks of launching a relief offensive. The duration of the siege and its eventual outcome made Deir ez-Zor a marker of both IS operational reach at its height and the limits of its ability to reduce a defended urban enclave, while the government's eventual recapture signaled a decisive shift in IS's capacity to hold and expand territory in eastern Syria.
- Siege of Kobanî
September 15, 2014
The Islamic State launched the siege of Kobanî in September 2014 with the objective of capturing the Kobanî Canton, a key administrative unit of the de facto autonomous region of Rojava in northern Syria. The assault represented a direct challenge to the Kurdish self-governance experiment in Rojava, pitting a defending force of roughly 1,500–2,000 fighters against an attacking Islamic State force estimated at 9,000. The engagement drew sustained international attention to IS's campaign to consolidate territorial control across northern Syria, and the scale of the attacking force relative to the defenders underscored the existential pressure on Rojava's political project. IS suffered recorded losses of over 1,400 fighters during the course of the siege, a figure that reflected the intensity and duration of the fighting in the urban terrain of the city.
- War against the Islamic State
June 13, 2014
The war against the Islamic State drew together a broad multinational coalition—operating under CJTF–OIR—in response to IS's rapid territorial expansion following its 2014 invasion of Iraq, its widely condemned executions, and its human rights abuses, as well as concern over further spillover from the Syrian civil war. Member states conducted military operations across Syria and Iraq, with smaller interventions later extended to IS-affiliated groups in Nigeria and Libya. The combined effort significantly degraded IS capabilities by around 2019–2020, reducing the organization from a proto-state controlling large contiguous territory to a contained force operating in a small area. As of 2026, fighting in Syria continued at a reduced level, with IS constrained in both territorial reach and force capability, representing a substantial but incomplete outcome for the coalition.
- 2015–2016 Latakia offensive
January 1, 2015
The 2015–2016 Latakia offensive was a government-led campaign to recapture rebel-held territory in the Latakia Governorate along the Turkish border. Launched in October 2015, it represented an effort by Syrian Arab Republic forces to reassert control over a strategically sensitive border region. The offensive was contested by Free Syrian Army elements, including forces operating under commanders tied to the Jabal al-Akrad area. Syrian Arab Republic casualties recorded at over 2,000 indicate sustained and costly fighting during the campaign. The operation was part of the broader pattern of government counteroffensives in the Syrian Civil War aimed at consolidating control over peripheral territories that rebels had held.
- Al-Hawl Offensive
November 30, 2015
The al-Hawl offensive was a Syrian Democratic Forces operation targeting the town of al-Hawl and surrounding countryside held by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The campaign was structured across three distinct operational areas — Tell Brak, al-Hawl, and the southern al-Hasakah city countryside — indicating an effort to clear a contiguous zone rather than a single point objective. With SDF forces numbering 2,700 against an estimated 1,000 ISIL defenders, and recorded ISIL casualties ranging from 112 to 493, the offensive inflicted measurable attrition on Islamic State forces in the region. The operation formed part of the broader SDF campaign to consolidate control over al-Hasakah Governorate during the Syrian Civil War, reducing ISIL's foothold in northeastern Syria.
- Palmyra Offensive
May 26, 2015
The Palmyra offensive of May 2015 was among the largest operations Islamic State conducted during the Syrian Civil War, and the largest IS launched inside Syria since the 2014 Eastern Syria offensive. Its outcome extended IS territorial control to at least 50 percent of Syrian territory, a significant expansion of the group's footprint within the country. Beyond the military and administrative consequences—IS gaining the Tadmur District of Homs Governorate, including the city of Palmyra—the offensive carried pronounced cultural stakes. The ancient ruins of Palmyra, a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1980, lay on the south-western edge of the modern city. That site had served as one of the ancient world's major trade and cultural crossroads, connecting the civilizations of Persia, India, and China with the Roman Empire. IS seizure of the area placed those monuments directly under its control, adding a heritage dimension to an already consequential territorial shift in the Syrian conflict.
- Second Battle of Idlib
March 28, 2015
The Second Battle of Idlib was a rebel offensive operation targeting Syrian government forces holding Idlib city in the Idlib Governorate. The operation was conducted by the Army of Conquest, a coalition force estimated between 3,000 and 6,000 fighters, against government defensive positions. The engagement formed part of the broader contest for control of northwestern Syria during the civil war, with Idlib city representing a significant urban and administrative center in the governorate. The Army of Conquest sustained 132 casualties in the course of the operation.
- Battle of al-Bab
November 6, 2016
The Battle of al-Bab was a multi-front urban engagement in the Aleppo Governorate fought to wrest the city from Islamic State control. Turkish-led forces advancing from the north, the Syrian Democratic Forces pressing from the east and west, and Syrian Army units moving from the south converged on the same operational objective, producing a fragmented but broadly effective encirclement. The outcome partitioned territorial gains among the competing parties: Turkish-led forces secured al-Bab itself along with Qabasin and Bizaah, the Syrian Army took Tadef and adjacent southern areas, and the SDF extended its positions to the east and west. The battle advanced Turkey's Operation Euphrates Shield by eliminating a significant Islamic State urban stronghold in Aleppo Governorate, while simultaneously hardening the de facto boundary between Turkish-backed and SDF-controlled zones — a fault line that shaped subsequent competition over northern Syria.
- Manbij offensive
August 27, 2016
- Operation Euphrates Shield
August 24, 2016
Operation Euphrates Shield marked Turkey's first large-scale direct military intervention in the Syrian Civil War, deploying Turkish Armed Forces alongside Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army factions into northern Syria. The operation established a Turkish-occupied zone in the area between the Euphrates River to the east and the rebel-held region around Azaz to the west. Turkey fought on two fronts simultaneously, engaging Islamic State forces while also contesting the Syrian Democratic Forces, reflecting Ankara's dual objective of degrading IS and limiting Kurdish territorial consolidation along its southern border. The operation concluded on 29 March 2017 when the Turkish military officially declared it successfully completed, cementing a lasting Turkish military footprint in northern Syria and setting a precedent for subsequent Turkish cross-border operations in the conflict.
- Palmyra offensive
March 9, 2016
- Palmyra offensive (December 2016)
December 8, 2016
The December 2016 Palmyra offensive resulted in ISIL re-capturing the ancient city after Syrian government forces had held it since March 2016. ISIL had previously controlled Palmyra from May 2015 until that earlier government recapture, making this the second time the city changed hands between the two belligerents. The offensive demonstrated ISIL's continued capacity to mass forces — estimated at 4,000–5,000 fighters — and conduct large-scale conventional assaults even as the group faced pressure elsewhere in the Syrian Civil War. An accompanying ISIL attack on the Tiyas T-4 Airbase to the west of Palmyra was repelled, limiting the strategic gains of the operation beyond the city itself. Syrian government casualties in the engagement were recorded between 100 and 352.
- Raqqa Campaign
November 6, 2016
The Raqqa campaign, launched in November 2016 by the Syrian Democratic Forces, targeted the Islamic State's capital city in the Raqqa Governorate. The operation aimed first to isolate Raqqa and then capture it outright, while subsidiary objectives included seizing the Tabqa Dam, the city of al-Thawrah, and the Mansoura Dam. Concluded successfully in October 2017, the campaign stripped the Islamic State of its symbolic and administrative center, dealing a decisive blow to the group's claim to territorial governance. The fall of Raqqa effectively dismantled the most prominent node of the self-declared caliphate within Syria, significantly degrading Islamic State's capacity to project authority across the Raqqa Governorate and the broader Rojava–Islamist conflict. The SDF, supported by U.S. military advisers, committed 30,000–40,000 fighters against an Islamic State force estimated at 10,000–20,000, sustaining over 1,100 casualties while inflicting nearly 3,800 on the defender.
- 2017 Shayrat missile strike
April 7, 2017
The Shayrat missile strike marked the first direct U.S. military action against Syrian government forces since the start of the civil war in 2011. Authorized by President Trump in response to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack three days earlier, the strike signaled a shift in U.S. posture toward the Assad government, moving from indirect involvement through opposition support to a direct punitive strike on regime infrastructure. By targeting Shayrat Airbase, the action tied American military force explicitly to chemical weapons use as a threshold, a departure from the restraint that had characterized U.S. policy following the 2013 Ghouta attack. Its longer-term effect on the Syrian government's conduct or on the trajectory of the civil war was not settled by this single strike, but it inserted a new variable into the conflict's international dimension.
- Palmyra offensive
March 2, 2017
- Battle of Khasham
February 8, 2018
The Battle of Khasham, fought near the towns of Khasham and Al Tabiyeh in the Deir ez-Zor Governorate, marked a direct kinetic confrontation between Operation Inherent Resolve coalition forces and Syrian government-aligned forces, including pro-government militias. Coalition air and artillery strikes were delivered in response to a reported attack on a joint U.S. military and Syrian Democratic Forces position, resulting in reported casualties of between 100 and 400 on the pro-government side. The engagement illustrated the layered and volatile nature of the Syrian theater, where U.S.-backed SDF operations against the Islamic State placed coalition forces in proximity to Syrian Armed Forces and affiliated militias, raising the potential for direct conflict between parties nominally pursuing separate objectives in the same operational space.
- December 2019 United States airstrikes in Iraq and Syria
January 1, 2019
On 29 December 2019, U.S. forces struck Kata'ib Hezbollah weapons depots and command centers in Iraq and Syria, killing at least 25 militiamen and wounding 55 more. The Department of Defense framed the operation as a direct response to a pattern of attacks on Iraqi bases hosting Operation Inherent Resolve coalition forces, culminating in a 27 December strike on a Kirkuk airbase that killed an American civilian contractor. The strikes marked a significant escalation in the low-intensity contest between U.S.-led coalition forces and Iranian-backed militias operating in Iraq, drawing Kata'ib Hezbollah — a Shi'ite militia funded by Iran — into sharper focus as a principal actor threatening coalition presence. Kata'ib Hezbollah denied responsibility for the preceding attacks, and the strikes contributed to a rapid deterioration in U.S.-Iran tensions that would intensify in the days that followed.
- Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019 – March 2020)
December 19, 2019
The 2019–2020 northwestern Syria offensive, codenamed 'Dawn of Idlib 2,' represented a major push by Syrian government forces, backed by Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah, against a coalition of Turkish-backed opposition factions including the Syrian National Army, Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, and the Turkistan Islamic Party. The operation intensified the contest over northwestern Syria, a zone where Russian-backed and Turkish-backed interests were in direct tension. The offensive resulted in roughly 980,000 civilians displaced, underscoring the humanitarian scale of the campaign and the degree to which population centers were caught between the competing military blocs. Combined casualties across both sides exceeded 2,900 killed, reflecting the sustained intensity of the fighting across the offensive's roughly three-month duration.
- Operation Spring Shield
February 27, 2020
Operation Spring Shield marked a significant direct military confrontation between Turkish forces and the Syrian Armed Forces in the Idlib Governorate, representing one of the most intense episodes of Turkish cross-border intervention in the Syrian Civil War. Launched in direct response to the Balyun airstrikes, the operation placed Turkey in open conflict with Syrian government forces and their allied militias, with Syrian casualties recorded at 3,159. The scale of Turkish force deployment—between 8,350 and 20,000 personnel—reflected the strategic weight Ankara assigned to the Idlib front, where the Turkish military had longstanding interests in containing Syrian government advances and managing displacement pressure on its border.
- Battle of Hasakah
January 20, 2022
- 2023 Homs drone strike
October 5, 2023
A drone strike on a graduation ceremony at the Homs Military Academy on 5 October 2023 produced mass casualties among Syrian military personnel, with at least 112 killed and more than 277 wounded. The attack came amid heightened clashes in the northwestern Syrian de-escalation zone, suggesting a connection to renewed pressure on the front lines, though no group claimed responsibility and the perpetrator remained unidentified. Striking a formal military ceremony deepened uncertainty about the conflict's trajectory at a moment when the de-escalation framework was already under strain.
- 2024 Syrian opposition offensives
November 27, 2024
On 27 November 2024, the Military Operations Command—led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham and supported by Turkish-backed Syrian National Army factions—launched an offensive against Ba'athist regime forces across Idlib, Aleppo, and Hama Governorates. What began as a localised push into towns in the Idlib and Aleppo countryside expanded into a nationwide campaign. The offensive ultimately culminated in the collapse of the Ba'athist regime, making it one of the most consequential actions of the Syrian Civil War's later phase. Despite the opposition fielding roughly 15,000 fighters against a nominally far larger regime force of 170,000, the campaign's momentum proved sufficient to bring down the government that had prosecuted the war since 2011.
- Israeli invasion of Syria
December 8, 2024
- Southern Syria offensive
November 29, 2024
Famous commanders of Syrian Civil War
12 shown
Abu Ali al-Anbari
Major1959–2016
Islamic State
5 battles ledΣ214 int
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
4 battles ledΣ206 int
Maher al-Assad
major general1967–
Ba'athist Syria
5 battles ledΣ204 int
Hulusi Akar
4 battles ledΣ195 int
Bashar al-Assad
3 battles ledΣ168 int
Yaşar Güler
3 battles ledΣ164 int
Suhayl al-Hasan
colonel1970–
Syrian Arab Republic
4 battles ledΣ153 int
Ahmed al-Sharaa
2 battles ledΣ135 int
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
2 battles ledΣ133 int
Abu Omar al-Shishani
sergeant1986–2016
Islamic State
3 battles ledΣ129 int
Qasem Soleimani
lieutenant general1957–2020
Ba'athist Syria
2 battles ledΣ125 int
İsmail Metin Temel
four-star rank1958–
Turkey
3 battles ledΣ118 int
Ranked by Σ battle intensity across battles led in scope. Strategic leaders (chiefs of state / supreme commanders) pinned to the top.
Other wars in this era
Contemporary
WAR· 2001–2021 major U.S. war period
Afghanistan War
The longest U.S. war began after 9/11, displaced the Taliban government, evolved into counterinsurgency, and ended with Taliban return to power.
WAR· 2002-2007
First Ivorian Civil War
The First Ivorian Civil War was a civil conflict in the Ivory Coast that began with a military rebellion on 19 September 2002 and ended with a peace agreement on 4 March 2007. The conflict pitted the government of Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo against a domestic insurgency led by the New Forces of Ivory Coast. A second civil war (2010–2011) would break out over the results of the 2010 Ivorian presidential election.
WAR· 2002
Insurgency in the Maghreb
An Islamist insurgency is taking place in the Maghreb region of North Africa, followed on from the end of the Algerian Civil War in 2002. The Algerian militant group Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC) allied itself with al-Qaeda to eventually become al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). The Algerian and other Maghreb governments fighting the militants have worked with the United States and the United Kingdom since 2007, when Operation Enduring Freedom – Trans Sahara began.
WAR· 2003
conflict in the Niger Delta
The current conflict in the Niger Delta first arose in the early 1990s over tensions between foreign oil corporations and a number of the Niger Delta's minority ethnic groups who feel they are being exploited, particularly the Ogoni and the Ijaw. Ethnic and political unrest continued throughout the 1990s despite the return to democracy and the election of the Obasanjo government in 1999. Struggle for oil wealth and environmental harm over its impacts has fueled violence between ethnic groups, causing the militarization of nearly the entire region by ethnic militia groups, Nigerian military and police forces, notably the Nigerian Mobile Police. The violence has contributed to Nigeria's ongoing energy supply crisis by discouraging foreign investment in new power generation plants in the region.