Skip to content
The War AtlasThe · War · Atlas

BATTLE // -201 BCE

Battle of Zama

LOADING MAP TELEMETRY…

Overview

The Battle of Zama was fought in 202 BC in what is now Tunisia between a Roman army commanded by Scipio Africanus and a Carthaginian army commanded by Hannibal. The battle was part of the Second Punic War and resulted in such a severe defeat for the Carthaginians that they capitulated, while Hannibal was forced into exile. The Roman army of approximately 40,000 men was outnumbered by the Carthaginians who fielded either 40,000 or 50,000; the Romans were stronger in cavalry, but the Carthaginians had 80 war elephants.

Overview adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Significance

The Battle of Zama ended the Second Punic War by delivering a decisive defeat to the Carthaginian army under Hannibal. The scale of the Carthaginian collapse — some 20,000 casualties against Roman losses of approximately 1,500 — was sufficient to compel Carthage to capitulate rather than continue the conflict. Hannibal, who had led Carthaginian forces through years of the war and inflicted major defeats on Roman armies in Italy, was driven into exile as a direct consequence. The engagement thus resolved the central strategic contest of the war: whether Carthage or Rome would hold dominant power in the western Mediterranean. With Carthaginian resistance extinguished at Zama, Rome secured the position it would build upon throughout the remainder of the ancient period.

Tactics

The Roman army, commanded by Scipio Africanus, was outnumbered by the Carthaginian force, which fielded either 40,000 or 50,000 troops against Roman strength of approximately 29,000 to 30,000. The Carthaginians also deployed 80 war elephants, giving them a notable materiel advantage in that arm. Rome, however, held superiority in . The overview does not describe in further detail how the engagement was fought in terms of maneuver, formation, or terrain use beyond these dispositions.

Forces & casualties

Troop strength

  • Rome29,000–30,000
    medium
  • Carthage40,000
    medium

Carthage fielded a 1.4 : 1 numerical advantage

Casualties

  • Rome1,500
    medium5% loss rate
  • Carthage20,000
    medium50% loss rate

Commanders (2)

Compare with sibling battle

6 options

Pick a battle to compare side-by-side

Related

6 sibling battles · 0 factions

Last verified July 2026
Cite this page →Suggest a correction →