Skip to content
The War AtlasThe · War · Atlas

High Middle Ages // 1096-1099

First Crusade

Tactical Map#

7 battles plotted

LOADING MAP TELEMETRY…

War Tempo#

Battle cadence by year

Campaigns#

0 operational sequences

    Battles#

    7 catalogued engagements

    • Siege of Xerigordon

      September 1, 1096

      The siege of Xerigordon was an early and catastrophic demonstration of the military vulnerability of the People's Crusade, the undisciplined mass movement that preceded the organized baronial forces of the First Crusade. A raiding party under Rainald of Broyes captured the Turkish fort of Xerigordon, some four days' march from Nicaea, intending to use it as a base for plundering the surrounding region. The Seljuk commander Elchanes, acting for Sultan Kilij Arslan I, arrived within three days and immediately placed the position under siege. The absence of any water supply inside the fortification proved fatal: after eight days the defenders capitulated. The surrender produced a stark religious reckoning — some crusaders converted to Islam while those who refused were killed. The episode foreshadowed the near-total destruction of the People's Crusade, illustrating that capturing and holding fortified positions in Anatolia required logistical preparation the movement entirely lacked.

    • The Battle of Dorylaeum on 7 July 1097 was an engagement between the Crusader forces of the First Crusade and the Sultanate of Rûm. The Crusader army, commanded by Bohemond of Taranto and Robert Curthose and numbering around 20,000, faced a Seljuk force of approximately 7,000 under Kilij Arslan and Gazi Gümüshtigin. Casualties were substantial on both sides — roughly 4,000 Crusaders and 3,000 Seljuk troops — indicating a hard-fought contest.

    • Siege of Antioch

      October 26, 1097

      The Siege of Antioch was a pivotal episode in the First Crusade, deciding control of one of the most strategically significant cities on the route from Constantinople to Jerusalem. The Crusaders invested the Seljuk-held city for more than seven months before taking it in June 1098. Control of Antioch was not secured until a second phase: a Seljuk relieving army under Kerbogha then besieged the Crusaders inside the city for three weeks, and the subsequent Battle of Antioch ended in a Crusader victory over that force. The outcome removed a major Seljuk presence from northern Syria and opened the road south toward Jerusalem. Beyond its operational consequences, the siege produced a lasting political result: Bohemond of Taranto claimed the city and established the Principality of Antioch, one of the Crusader states that would define Latin political power in the Levant for generations. The siege thus shaped both the military trajectory of the First Crusade and the territorial order that followed it.

    • Siege of Nicaea

      June 25, 1097

      The Siege of Nicaea was the first major battle of the First Crusade, establishing the military viability of the combined crusader force under leaders including Bohemond of Taranto, Raymond IV of Toulouse, and Godfrey of Bouillon. The city's garrison, under pressure from a crusader force numbering some 30,000, ultimately surrendered not to the crusaders but to the Byzantines, reflecting the complex relationship between the crusading contingents and their Byzantine allies. The outcome secured a key Seljuk-held city and opened the route deeper into Anatolia. It was followed in sequence by the Battle of Dorylaeum and the Siege of Antioch, making Nicaea the opening engagement in a chain of operations that defined the crusade's advance through what is now Turkey.

    • Siege of Ma'arra

      November 1, 1098

      The siege of Ma'arrat al-Nu'man in late 1098 was one of the most notorious episodes of the First Crusade, distinguished primarily by reported acts of cannibalism committed by Crusader forces against the city's population. The event occurred during the broader Crusader push through Syria toward Jerusalem and involved senior commanders including Raymond IV of Toulouse, Bohemond of Taranto, and Robert II of Flanders. With casualties recorded at 20,000, the siege stands as one of the most lethal engagements of the campaign. The reports of cannibalism attached a lasting infamy to the siege that set it apart from other episodes of Crusader violence during the march south, and have made it a recurring reference point in accounts of the First Crusade's conduct.

    • Battle of Ascalon

      August 18, 1099

      The Battle of Ascalon, fought shortly after the capture of Jerusalem, is generally regarded as the concluding military action of the First Crusade. The Crusader army under Godfrey of Bouillon engaged and defeated a Fatimid Egyptian force under Al-Afdal Shahanshah that substantially outnumbered the crusading forces, with the Fatimid army fielding roughly 20,000 troops against approximately 10,200 Crusaders. The Fatimid side sustained recorded casualties of 12,700. By driving off the Egyptian relief army, the Crusaders consolidated their hold on Jerusalem and denied the Fatimid Caliphate an immediate opportunity to reverse the results of the city's fall. The engagement thus served as a defensive validation of the campaign's territorial gains: without a victory at Ascalon, the newly established Crusader presence in Jerusalem would have faced an organized Fatimid counteroffensive within weeks of the city's capture.

    • Siege of Jerusalem

      June 13, 1099

      The Siege of Jerusalem was the culminating military objective of the First Crusade, which had begun in 1096. The city was held by a Fatimid Caliphate garrison under Iftikhar ad-Dawla, numbering approximately 3,000 troops, against a Crusader force estimated at 12,000–15,000 men under a coalition of commanders including Godfrey of Bouillon, Raymond IV of Toulouse, Robert II of Normandy, Robert II of Flanders, Eustace III of Boulogne, Tancred of Galilee, Gaston IV of Béarn, Berenguer Ramon II, and Guglielmo Embriaco. Casualties on both sides were recorded at approximately 3,000 each. As the stated destination of the Crusade and the symbolic center of the conflict between Latin Christian and Islamic power in the Levant, the siege represented the operational endpoint toward which the entire campaign — from the assembly of forces in 1096 through engagements across Anatolia and the Levant — had been directed.

    Famous commanders of First Crusade

    12 shown

    Ranked by Σ battle intensity across battles led in scope. Strategic leaders (chiefs of state / supreme commanders) pinned to the top.

    Other wars in this era

    High Middle Ages

    Last verified July 2026
    Cite this page →Suggest a correction →